BizStore » Books » The Ambivalent Internet: Mischief, Oddity, and Antagonism Online
Brand: WILEY ACADEMIC
Feature: WILEY ACADEMIC
Item Dimensions: Array
Number Of Items: 1
Number Of Pages: 240
Publication Date: 2017-06-26
• WILEY ACADEMIC
This book explores the weird and mean and in-between that characterize everyday expression online, from absurdist photoshops to antagonistic Twitter hashtags to deceptive identity play.
Whitney Phillips and Ryan M. Milner focus especially on the ambivalence of this expression: the fact that it is too unwieldy, too variable across cases, to be essentialized as old or new, vernacular or institutional, generative or destructive. Online expression is, instead, all of the above. This ambivalence, the authors argue, hinges on available digital tools. That said, there is nothing unexpected or surprising about even the strangest online behavior. Ours is a brave new world, and there is nothing new under the sun – a point necessary to understanding not just that online spaces are rife with oddity, mischief, and antagonism, but why these behaviors matter.
The Ambivalent Internet is essential reading for students and scholars of digital media and related fields across the humanities, as well as anyone interested in mediated culture and expression.
• Kill All Normies: Online Culture Wars From 4Chan And Tumblr To Trump And The Alt-Right
• This Is Why We Can't Have Nice Things: Mapping the Relationship between Online Trolling and Mainstream Culture (MIT Press)
• The World Made Meme: Public Conversations and Participatory Media (The Information Society Series)
• (Not) Getting Paid to Do What You Love: Gender, Social Media, and Aspirational Work
• Heart of the Machine: Our Future in a World of Artificial Emotional Intelligence
• Personal Connections in the Digital Age (Digital Media and Society)
• Participatory Culture in a Networked Era: A Conversation on Youth, Learning, Commerce, and Politics
• WHO SAYS?: The Writer's Research
• SO WHAT?: The Writer's Argument
• Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest